• Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
  • Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
Live Adalat
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
Live Adalat
Home»Columns»Mandatory CLAT Clearance For Appointing NTPC Law Officer Violates Article 16 of Indian Constitution: Kerala High Court

Mandatory CLAT Clearance For Appointing NTPC Law Officer Violates Article 16 of Indian Constitution: Kerala High Court

0
By Kanika Bhatnagar on June 17, 2022 Columns, Current News, Judiciary, Point of View, Top Stories
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram WhatsApp

The Kerala High Court ruled that the requirement that applicants pass the CLAT exam in order to apply for the position of Assistant Law Officer at the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC) was in violation of Article 16 of the Indian Constitution.

To avoid upsetting the entire selection process, Justice V.G. Arun ordered the respondents to accept the petitioner’s application and conduct a screening process to determine her eligibility.

“The selection process is confined to only candidates who had participated in the CLAT-2021 PG programme, which violates Article 16 of the Constitution of India. Having held so, rather than upsetting the whole selection process, I deem it more appropriate to direct the second respondent to accept the petitioner’s application and conduct a selection test or interview for testing her eligibility for appointment to the notified post. Further action with respect to the appointment shall be taken depending on the outcome of such selection test/interview.”

An aspirant for the position of Assistant Law Officer at NTPC and an LL.M student at CUSAT with a specialisation in Intellectual Property Rights has filed an application. She earned a 70 percent average on her LLB and claims to have multiple academic honours to her name, making her qualified to apply for the position of Assistant Law Officer at NTPC.

The Corporation’s notification, however, stipulates that the candidate must have taken the CLAT-2021 exam in order to be considered for the position, and that they would be shortlisted based on their performance in the exam.

The petitioner’s lawyer, Maitreyi S. Hegde, argued that as a public sector undertaking falling under the definition of Article 12 of the Constitution, the NTPC cannot deny opportunities to people like the petitioner simply because she is pursuing her post-graduate studies at a university that is not part of the consortium of National Law Universities.

It was also stated that there is no connection between the goal of imposing such a restriction and the goal of the CLAT exam, which is to measure students’ intellectual brilliance, and the NTPC’s goal of selecting the finest among legal practitioners.

According to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the employer has complete discretion over the eligibility conditions for appointment to a given position. CLAT, he explained, is a national-level exam administered by the Consortium of National Universities for the purpose of filtering and choosing the best pupils.

Because of the high quality of law graduates picked through CLAT PG programmes, not only NTPC, but a number of other PSUs are following suit. Only 23 of India’s 1721 law institutions are members of the Consortium of National Law Universities, according to the judge.

The claim that graduates from other law schools would have taken the CLAT-PG cannot be accepted, because such candidates would make up a small percentage of the CLAT-PG candidates.

Law graduates aspiring to be appointed in public sector undertakings, according to the petitioner, cannot be expected to take an admission test in the hopes that it will be used as a criterion for selection to PSUs in the future; even candidates who had performed well in the previous year’s CLAT PG were not eligible.

As a result, the announcement limiting the selection process to individuals who have taken the CLAT-2021 PG programme was deemed to be indirect discrimination.

The test’s concentration, according to the judge, was on academics rather than assessing the skill set anticipated of future law officers. 

“Even if the argument that students graduating from NLUs acquire more skill and knowledge than their less fortune brethren is accepted, that is no reason to deny a level playing field to the others. As long as the Constitution guarantees equality of opportunity to the citizens, the State and its instrumentalities have a corresponding duty to ensure such opportunity to all.”

The respondents’ contention that conducting a selection exam across India for 10 positions is inefficient also fails when assessed against the touchstone of Article 16.

The respondents were given one month to perform a selection process for the petitioner after the court determined that the selection process had no relation to the goal.

CLAT Kerala High Court Live Adalat NLU NTPC Law Officer
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram WhatsApp
Previous ArticleWhile Crimes Against Women Are Rising; Society’s Patriarchal Perspective is Changing: Kerala High Court
Next Article Karkardooma court acquitted two men, Suraj and Yogender Singh in a case of North East Delhi riots of 2020

Related Posts

Advocate Jaya Sukin writes to AG KK Venugopal for consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Retired Justice & Advocates for the statements on SC‘s oral observation on Nupur Sharma

July 5, 2022

15 retired judges, 77 senior bureaucrats, and 25 retired armed forces officials submitted an open letter to CJI NV Ramana against observation made by Justices Surya Kant & JB Pardiwala in Nupur Sharma case

July 5, 2022

Judges Must Refrain From Making Derogatory Remarks About Parties Unless It Is Absolutely Necessary For Making a Decision: High Court of J&K&L

July 5, 2022

Comments are closed.

The Live Adalat welcomes articles, blog posts and other forms of content. If you are interested in writing for us, joining us please write to us at adalatlive@gmail.com
Top judgements of March
https://liveadalat.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WhatsApp-Video-2022-03-28-at-16.39.34.mp4
VIEW MORE VIDEOS
INTERESTING LEGAL FACTS
VIEW MORE VIDEOS

Participate in Live Adalat Legal Quiz

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Contact Us

Email : info@liveadalat.com

Subscribe Newsletter

© 2022 Liveadalat.com
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Terms

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?