• Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
  • Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
Live Adalat
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Home
  • Current News
  • Columns
  • Judiciary
  • Know your law
  • Stories
  • International News
  • Taxation News
  • Voice of Women
Live Adalat
Home»Columns»“New ‘Trend’ of Government maligning judges”: CJI NV Ramana during hearing plea by Chattisgarh Government

“New ‘Trend’ of Government maligning judges”: CJI NV Ramana during hearing plea by Chattisgarh Government

0
By Tanushree Chakraborty on April 8, 2022 Columns, Current News, Stories, Top Stories
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram WhatsApp

NV (CJI) Ramana, the Chief Justice of India, criticised the recent tendency of administrations attempting to defame the judiciary on Friday. Attempts to cast aspersions on judges were formerly limited to private groups, according to the CJI, but the government has recently joined the bandwagon.

“Judges are being maligned by the administration in a new trend. This is regrettable, and we’re seeing it in court as well. Previously, only private parties used this method. This is something we see on a daily basis “he stated “It’s fine if you engage in any fights. But don’t try to smear the judiciary. I’m also keeping an eye on these courts because it’s a new trend “remarked the CJI.

Senior Advocate Dave then stated that no one has been wronged in the incident. “That is a tendency that no one can tolerate for even a minute. Please consider the logic; it is not the trend or vindictiveness that is at fault “Mr Dave stated.

The charge of excessive assets, according to Mr Dave, is true. When an investigation is requested, the respondent will be asked to explain his assets; if he is able to do so, the investigation will be ended. “We can’t allow this kind of persecution to continue based on our suspicions and your complaints,” the Bench added.

“It wasn’t a case of guesswork. We estimate that someone has amassed 2500 crores “Mr Dave stated.

The bench was considering a special leave petition filed by Uchit Sharma, an anti-corruption activist, challenging the Chattisgarh High Court’s order quashing an FIR registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act as a result of a state inquiry conducted after the present petitioner filed a complaint.


The CJI presided over a hearing on a petition challenging a Chhattisgarh High Court ruling that rejected a first information report (FIR) filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Court ultimately adjourned the case. The matter will be heard again by the Bench on April 18th.

Uchit Sharma has claimed in his petition filed through Advocates MP Vinod and Pranjal Kishore that his complaint against Singh and his family members, the private respondents, led to a preliminary investigation by the State, which revealed that the private respondents had assets disproportionate to their income.

Following that, an FIR was filed under Sections 13 (1) (b) and (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as well as Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. With the assailed order, the same has been quashed.

The High Court ruled that the FIR is based on probabilities, and that “no one may be tried on the basis of likelihood.”

The impugned order was issued in a writ case filed by the private respondents in the High Court, contesting the State’s authorization to conduct an investigation under the PC Act against them. The High Court had granted them protection from coercion through an interim order.

The State of Chhattisgarh had also filed a plea seeking to have the interim order directing no coercive action vacated, according to the submission. The State said that the accused took advantage of the order and did not help with the inquiry.

CJI Live Adalat NV Ramana
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram WhatsApp
Previous ArticleMadras High Court Upholds The Validity Of State Law Providing 7.5% Reservation For Govt School Students In Medical Examinations
Next Article 500 Law Institutions Across India “Sub-standard” Or “Below standard”: Law Minister Kiren Rijiju

Related Posts

Navjot Singh Sidhu moves Supreme Court seeking additional time to surrender after getting 1 year jail term

May 20, 2022

Education Loan cannot be denied due to low CIBIL score of Parents: Kerala High Court

May 19, 2022

NIA Court convicts Kashmiri separatist terrorist Yasin Malik, after he pleaded guilty in connection with J&K terror funding case

May 19, 2022

Comments are closed.

The Live Adalat welcomes articles, blog posts and other forms of content. If you are interested in writing for us, joining us please write to us at adalatlive@gmail.com
Top judgements of March
https://liveadalat.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WhatsApp-Video-2022-03-28-at-16.39.34.mp4
VIEW MORE VIDEOS
INTERESTING LEGAL FACTS
VIEW MORE VIDEOS

Participate in Live Adalat Legal Quiz

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Contact Us

Email : info@liveadalat.com

Subscribe Newsletter

© 2022 Liveadalat.com
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Terms

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?